Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01285
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Webster
as 2:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Webster
Plaintiff:
Clarence Eugene Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv01350
Defendant:
Known and Unknown Parties, United States of America and Utilization Review Committee Members of Federal Correctional Institution Sheridan Health Services Department
Plaintiff:
Don A. Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Long et al
as 3:2017cv00325
Defendant:
Adventist Health Care Systems, Deputy Dye, Deputy Jungling and others
Plaintiff:
Darren James Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Nelson et al
as 6:2016cv00232
Defendant:
Deputy Barkhurst, Deputy Brown, Lt. Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Darren James Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00953
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Webster v. Aramark Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00652
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Inc., Sr. Claims Examiner Therese Brady, Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Brent Evan Webster and Webster Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Blanton et al
as 6:2014cv00634
Defendant:
Sheriff Larry Blanton, Lt. Scott Lutz, Sgt. Molan and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. The State of Oregon et al
as 2:2011cv00225
Respondent:
County of Multnomah, Adam Gibbs, Ron Hoesly and others
Petitioner:
Brent Evan Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
