Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Downey v. Duval County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Bryan Downey
Defendant:
Duval County Jail, Perkins, Clarida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahone v. Duval County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv01441
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jerome Mahone
Defendant:
Duval County Jail, D. Cope, Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahone v. Duval County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv01144
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mahone
Defendant:
Duval County Jail, Lt. Bert, Sgt. Cope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahone v. Cope et al
as 3:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mahone
Defendant:
Sgt. Cope, Officer Carnona, Officer Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodson v. Strozier et al
as 1:2017cv22110
Defendant:
Marc W. Morris, Micheal J. Strozier, Katherine Fernandez-Rundle and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Damarcus Woodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cope v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2016cv00451
Petitioner:
Charles Wayne Cope
Respondent:
State of Florida and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cope v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2015cv23383
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Cope
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2014cv14114
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Cope
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fur'Qaan v. McClure et al
as 8:2008cv00442
Plaintiff:
Yusef Abdul Fur'Qaan
Defendant:
Robert Sowden McClure, J. Thomas McGrady, Thomas Cope and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
AWALA v. QUINCE et al
as 1:2007cv00239
Plaintiff:
GBEKE MICHAEL AWALA
Defendant:
QUINCE, CANTERO, PARIENTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
