Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01652
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Stocks v. City of Rome et al
as 4:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Keith Obryann Stocks, Keith Obryann Stocks Trust, Keith Obryann Stocks Estate and others
Defendant:
City of Rome, Floyd County Sheriff's Department, 2 Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Beaubrun: v. Select Portfolio Servicing
as 1:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
Thony El Beaubrun: and Thony Beaubrun El
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Beaubrun v. Avest Central Mortgage Company
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
Thony Beaubrun El and Thony Beaubrun
Defendant:
Avest Central Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILLIARD EL-BEY v. LYNN et al
as 7:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL LEE HILLIARD EL-BEY
Respondent:
Captain STEPHEN D LYNN, RONALD L DAVIS and JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tehuti-El v. Bell
as 2:2022cv00099
Petitioner:
Ausar Tehuti-El
Respondent:
Adam Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tehuti-El v. Bell
as 2:2022cv00064
Petitioner:
Ausar Tehuti-El
Respondent:
Adam Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
