Cases 1 - 10 of 506
Bryant v. Truong et al
as 5:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
William Bryant
Defendant:
Cindy H Truong, Emily Grossnicklaus and Vicki Behenna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurst v. Harpe et al
as 6:2024cv00209
Petitioner:
Shaun Lovell Franklin Hurst
Defendant:
Steven Harpe, Rick Williams and Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stacey v. Kellough et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Oren Stacey
Defendant:
William Kellough and Tulsa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner:
Patrick Henry Hill, II
Respondent:
William C Rankins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shook v. Williams
as 5:2024cv00489
Petitioner:
Michael Sean Shook
Respondent:
Richard Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ryan T. Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norman v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Marcell Jeron Norman
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long et al v. Harrison
as 4:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Richard W Long, Richard William Long and Sheryl D Dorman
Respondent:
Sharon Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loggins v. Huffman et al
as 6:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Loggins and Tony
Defendant:
J. Huffman, C. Kirkland, Unknown Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
