Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Davis v. Davies et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Mrs. Davies and David Pedro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawley v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Bryan Wayne Crawley
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Sandy Whitbread, Dana Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA
as 1:2024cv00257
Petitioner:
Anthony Wayne Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Champagne v. State of Oregon
as 2:2023cv01679
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Champagne
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Christine Landers, Brian Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houff v. Pruitt
as 3:2023cv00674
Petitioner:
Wayne Thomas Houff
Respondent:
Erika Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pruett v. Kast et al
as 6:2022cv01786
Plaintiff:
Justin Wayne Prett and Justin Wayne Pruett
Defendant:
Joe Kast, Tad Larson, Sgt. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01222
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01110
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Seaquist v. Fhuere
as 6:2022cv01089
Petitioner:
Jeremy Wayne Seaquist
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. State of Oregon
as 3:2022cv00731
Petitioner:
Samuel Robert Wayne Jacox Lewis and Samuel Wayne Jacox
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
