Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Wells-Beck v. State of Oregon Board of Parole
as 3:2024cv00220
Petitioner:
Katherine Wells-Beck
Respondent:
State of Oregon Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wells v. State of Oregon
as 3:2023cv01821
Petitioner:
Katherine Wells
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wells v. Highberger
as 6:2023cv01426
Petitioner:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Respondent:
J. Highberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Denney v. Jackson County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
Donald Lawrence Denney
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail and Well Path - Jail Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Corrections, DSG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2022cv01628
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant:
State of Oregon and Oregon Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2022cv01124
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant:
State of Oregon and Oregon Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maughan v. Wells et al
as 3:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Ryan Darley Maughan
Defendant:
Officer Christopher Wells, Officer S. Lloyd, Mark Knighton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01804
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woodroffe v. Lincoln County Community Justice et al
as 6:2021cv01053
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodroffe
Defendant:
Lincoln County Community Justice, Tony Campa, Susie O'Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
