Cases 1 - 10 of 430
Young v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv01557
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Petitioner:
Darryl William Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kerr v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2024cv01547
Defendant:
Dr. Lawson Eleazer, Multnomah County and Sheriff Nicole Morrisey O'Donnell
Plaintiff:
William David Kerr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaskin v. Beamer et al
as 2:2024cv01123
Plaintiff:
William P. Gaskin
Defendant:
Margo Anderson, Dr. Beamer, A. Stills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gable v. Ackom et al
as 6:2024cv01131
Defendant:
Karl Nelson, William Pierce, Emil Brandaw and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Gable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burrell v. Miller
as 6:2024cv01324
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Petitioner:
William Lamar Burrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dorazio v. Reyes et al
as 3:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
William Dorazio
Defendant:
Erin Reyes, C. Dieter, Dr. Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2024cv00832
Defendant:
Jordan Woodward, Arnulfo Nicolas, James Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Barrett Craig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00511
Petitioner:
William Thompson
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
William S. Boyd
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Charles Cox, P. Maney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Edmonds et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo L. Jones
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney Edmonds, U.S. Attorney Williams, Det. Slater and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
