Cases 1 - 10 of 77,551
JONES v. GADSDEN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
ROBERT LEE JONES
Respondent:
GADSDEN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOUCHTON v. PADGETT et al
as 5:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY TOUCHTON
Defendant:
DEAN PADGETT and RICKY MAZINGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEATLEY v. STAPLES
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
TERENCE EDWARD WHEATLEY
Defendant:
BONNIE HANNA STAPLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. SUTTON et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
SHER'MON A ALLEN
Defendant:
ADAM SUTTON, R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant:
R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS, DONALD LEAVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. FOSKEY et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
ELIAS FOSKEY and JOHN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodside, Rashad v. Miami Residential Reentry Office
as 1:2024cv22171
Plaintiff:
Rashad Woodside
Defendant:
Miami Residential Reentry Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones, Jr, Daniel v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv14178
Plaintiff:
Daniel G Jones, Jr
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Action to compel U.S. officer to perform duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
