Cases 1 - 10 of 1,842
WASHINGTON v. SHELL et al
as 3:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
GREGORY F WASHINGTON
Defendant:
K SHELL and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thevenin v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2024cv80682
Plaintiff:
Loveus Thevenin
Defendant:
Ric L. Bradshaw and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
C Jones, D. Luke, FNU Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Colwell v. Schwarz et al
as 6:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Chad Colwell
Defendant:
LEO Matthew Schwarz, LEO John Doe 1 and LEO John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. JACOBSEN et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant:
K JACOBSEN, R F CALDWELL, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley, Sean v. St. Lucie County et al
as 2:2024cv14160
Plaintiff:
Sean Riley
Defendant:
St. Lucie County, Petri Maze, Sgt. Lamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. DOE et al
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
DENZEL EVANS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bless, Alfredo v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2024cv80636
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Bless and Alfredo -a- Bless
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, The Palm Beach County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Doe
as 8:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBERS v. NICOLAS et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
KEION NATHANIEL CHAMBERS
Defendant:
C NICOLAS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
