Cases 41 - 50 of 78
USA v. $10,040 (US)
as 6:2020cv00237
Plaintiff:
USA and United States of America
Defendant:
$10,040 (US) and $10,040.00 (US) currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
USA v. $200,980 (US)
as 1:2019cv01561
Defendant:
$200,980 (US) and $200,980 (US) currency
Plaintiff:
USA and United States of America
Claimant:
Lesli Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $36,000 (US) et al
as 3:2019cv01473
Defendant:
$18,000 (US), $36,000 (US), $18,000 (US) currency and others
Plaintiff:
USA and United States of America
Claimant:
Oscar Candelario
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $8,000 (US)
as 3:2019cv01296
Plaintiff:
USA and United States of America
Defendant:
$8,000 (US)
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. 500 Domain Names, in rem et al
as 3:2019cv01093
Defendant:
Lunarpages Account: "Angel165", in rem, Dreamhost Account: "Folkspost.com", in rem and 500 Domain Names, in rem
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
USA v. 2562 Sibley Drive, Atlanta, Georgia
as 1:2019cv00846
Defendant:
2562 Sibley Drive, Atlanta, Georgia
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
USA v. Real Property at 300 Gaerky Creek Rd., et al
as 3:2019cv00235
Defendant:
1205 Pine Grove Road, Rogue River and Real Property at 300 Gaerky Creek Rd.
Plaintiff:
USA
Claimant:
Maryam Shafei and Ashland Hills Trust
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
USA v. $1,619,120.00 (US) et al
as 3:2019cv00358
Defendant:
$54,991.45 (US), $152,285.00 (US), $1,619,120.00 (US) and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. Eight (8) Real Properties, in rem
as 3:2018cv02152
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Eight (8) Real Properties, in rem and Baohong Deng
Claimant:
Hui Chang Guan, Chaojin Hu, Shirley Yu and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. 16470 NW Meadow Lake Road, Carlton, Oregon, in rem
as 3:2019cv00071
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
16470 NW Meadow Lake Road, Carlton, Oregon, in rem
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
