Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 71 - 80 of 146
United States of America v. $387,163.26 IN FUNDS SEIZED FROM COMERICA BANK ACCOUNT #1852-07027-3 IN THE NAME OF DAMAN & NISSAN, INC. DBA BIG APPLE FRUIT MARKET et al
as 2:2013cv11843
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $387,163.26 IN FUNDS SEIZED FROM COMERICA BANK ACCOUNT #1852-07027-3 IN THE NAME OF DAMAN & NISSAN, INC. DBA BIG APPLE FRUIT MARKET and $66,456.28 IN FUNDS SEIZED FROM COMERICA BANK ACCOUNT #1852-62518-3 IN THE NAME OF JUNCTION PARTY STORE INC.
Claimant: Daman & Nissan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 981
United States of America v. FUNDS FROM FIFTH THIRD BANK ACCOUNT #0065006695 IN THE AMOUNT OF FIFTY NINE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE DOLLARS AND THREE CENTS ($59,675.03) IN THE NAME OF CHINA LITE RESTAURANT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv11728
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: FUNDS FROM FIFTH THIRD BANK ACCOUNT #0065006695 IN THE AMOUNT OF FIFTY NINE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE DOLLARS AND THREE CENTS ($59,675.03) IN THE NAME OF CHINA LITE RESTAURANT and FUNDS FROM FIFTH THIRD BANK ACCOUNT #0065010611 IN THE AMOUNT OF SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED TWENTY DOLLARS AND SIXTY THREE CENTS ($75,920.63) IN THE NAME OF CHINA LITE RESTAURANT
Counter_claimant: FUNDS FROM FIFTH THIRD BANK ACCOUNT #0065010611 IN THE AMOUNT OF SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED TWENTY DOLLARS AND SIXTY THREE CENTS ($75,920.63) IN THE NAME OF CHINA LITE RESTAURANT and FUNDS FROM FIFTH THIRD BANK ACCOUNT #0065006695 IN THE AMOUNT OF FIFTY NINE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE DOLLARS AND THREE CENTS ($59,675.03) IN THE NAME OF CHINA LITE RESTAURANT
Counter_defendant: United States of America
United States of America v. Currency $107,244 From Fifth Third Bancorp Account #7913741646 et al
as 2:2013cv11701
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Currency $107,244 From Fifth Third Bancorp Account #7913741646 and Currency $129,151.19 From Huntington National Bank Account # 01381772878
United States of America v. Currency $4,267 et al
as 2:2013cv11137
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Currency $4,267 and Currency $11,799.58 from Comerica Bank Account # 1851493062
United States of America v. Currency $25,944.00 et al
as 2:2013cv11045
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Currency $25,944.00, Vehicle 2011 Lexus LX570 VIN: JTJHY7AX5B4073552, Vehicle 2005 Honda CR-V VIN:SHSRD789X5U327403 and others
United States of America v. Currency $17,341.79 From Bank of America Account #005405623165
as 2:2013cv10597
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Currency $17,341.79 From Bank of America Account #005405623165
United States of America v. Currency $10,195.67 From Comerica Bank Account No. 1852648870 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv10571
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Currency $10,195.67 From Comerica Bank Account No. 1852648870
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1341
United States of America v. Currency $10,548.67 from JP Morgan Chase Account #738826973 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv10371
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Currency $10,548.67 from JP Morgan Chase Account #738826973 , Currency $7,471.38 from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account #2963159161 , Currency $13,509 and others
United States of America v. Currency $34,490.49 from Fifth Third Bank Account XXXXXX3312 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv15374
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Currency $85,807.01 from PNC Bank Account XXXXXX1653 , Currency $34,490.49 from Fifth Third Bank Account XXXXXX3312 and Martell Developments, LLC
United States of America v. Curreny $61,721 et al
as 4:2012cv14503
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Curreny $61,721, Currency $7,153.75 from Telcom Credit Union Account #2039300 and Currency $1,821.34 from Comerica Bank Account #6819273886

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?