Cases 1 - 10 of 28
United States of America v. 354 Units, more or less, of an article labeled as ELF BAR EB Design Airo Max Disposable (5000 Puffs) in various flavors, ET AL.
as 2:2024cv02772
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
354 UNITS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE LABELED AS ELF BAR EB DESIGN AIRO MAX DISPOSABLE (5000 PUFFS) IN VARIOUS FLAVORS, ET AL., 354 Units, more or less, of an article labeled as ELF BAR EB Design Airo Max Disposable (5000 Puffs) in various flavors, Elf Bar EB Design BC5000 Vape Disposables (5000 Puff) in Various Flavors and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Unknown Plaintiff v. 354 UNITS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE LABELED AS ELF BAR EB DESIGN AIRO MAX DISPOSABLE (5000 PUFFS) IN VARIOUS FLAVORS, ET AL.
as 2:2024cv02767
Defendant:
354 UNITS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE LABELED AS ELF BAR EB DESIGN AIRO MAX DISPOSABLE (5000 PUFFS) IN VARIOUS FLAVORS, ET AL.
Plaintiff:
Unknown Plaintiff
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE 2023 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER SUV, MISCELLANEOUS LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER VEHICLE ACCESSORIES, et al.
as 2:2023cv09509
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ONE 2023 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER SUV, MISCELLANEOUS LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER VEHICLE ACCESSORIES, et al.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. One 2023 Land Rover Range Rover SUV et al.
as 8:2023cv02113
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ONE 2023 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER SUV, MISCELLANEOUS LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER VEHICLE ACCESSORIES, et al., One 2023 Land Rover Range Rover SUV, Miscellaneous Land Rover Range Rover Vehicle Accessories and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. 241,634.03 in funds from City National Bank account ending in X2325 et al
as 2:2021cv04404
Defendant:
$241,634.03 IN FUNDS FROM CITY NATIONAL BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN X2325, ET AL.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. 762,201.48 Seized From U.S. Bank Account No. 8773 et al
as 2:2021cv01829
Defendant:
$961,136.43 Seized From Wells Fargo Bank Account No. '0383, $397,883.73 Seized From Wells Fargo Bank Account No. '1199, $762,201.48 Seized From U.S. Bank Account No. '8773 and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
Khaled J. Al-Sabah
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Real Property Located In Los Angeles, California
as 2:2021cv01832
Defendant:
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and Real Property Located in Beverly Hills, California
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
Khaled J. Al-Sabah and Victor Franco Noval
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. 391.5873617 in Bitcoin et al
as 2:2020cv11712
Defendant:
391.5873617 in Bitcoin, et al., 391.5873617 in Bitcoin, One California Squid Permit and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. 865,894.54 Seized From Three Bank And Credit Union Accounts, The Balances on Approximately Thirteen California Employment Development Department Benefit Debit Cards and 11,679.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2020cv07844
Defendant:
$865,894.54 Seized From Three Bank And Credit Union Accounts, et al. and 865,894.54 Seized From Three Bank And Credit Union Accounts, The Balances on Approximately Thirteen California Employment Development Department Benefit Debit Cards and 11,679.00 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Real Property Located in Beverly Hills, California
as 2:2020cv06318
Defendant:
Real Property Located in Beverly Hills, California
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Beverly Hills Real Estate Holdings, LLC, Khaled J. Al Sabah, County of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
