Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in Louisiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
United States of America v. 14019 Emma Way Cove Drive, Gonzales, Louisiana 70737
as 3:2023cv00555
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: In Re: 14019 Emma Way Cove Drive, Gonzales, Louisiana 70737, 14019 Emma Way Cove Drive, Gonzales, Louisiana 70737, $61,576.99 from Navy Federal Credit Union Account Number XXXXXX8007 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. Currency et al
as 2:2022cv03502
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Gulf Coast Bank Cashier's Check Number 244257 in the Amount of $194,703.31, Gulf Coast Cashier's Check Number 244258 in the Amount of $364,353.55, Regions Bank Cashier's Check Number 5506931808 in the Amount of $30,190.10 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $277,872.39 from Pelican State Credit Union Account Number XXX007 in the Name of Elliott Sterling et al
as 3:2021cv00700
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: IN RE: $277,872.39 FROM PELICAN STATE CREDIT UNION ACCOUNT NUMBER XXX007 IN THE NAME OF ELLIOTT STERLING; $130,000.00 FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK RELATED TO JP MORGAN CHASE BANK CASHIERS CHECK, $277,872.39 From Pelican State Credit Union Account Number XXX007 in the Name of Elliott Sterling and $130,000.00 from JP Morgan Chase Bank Related to JP Morgan Chase Bank Cashier
Not Classified By Court: Elliott Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. $522,446.09 from Bank of America Account No. XXXXXXXX3067 in the Name of Bootstate Financial Group, et al
as 3:2021cv00388
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: In Re: $535,727.50 In US Currency, In re: $13,281.41 in U.S. Currency, $522,446.09 from Bank of America Account No. XXXXXXXX3067 in the Name of Bootstate Financial Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $477,225 in B1 Bank Account No. 080030125069 in the name of Interstate Construction Group, Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00041
Defendant: $477,225 in BI Bank and $477,225 in B1 Bank Account No. 080030125069 in the name of Interstate Construction Group, Inc
Plaintiff: United States of America
Not Classified By Court: Richard Hebert, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
United States of America v. $365,600.00 from Investar Bank We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00042
Defendant: $365,600.00 from Investar Bank
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
United States of America v. One Hundred Seventy-Nine Thousand Dollars in U.S. Currency in JPMorgan Chase Bank Safe Deposit Bank in the Name of Travis James We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00664
Defendant: One Hundred Seventy-Nine Thousand Dollars in U.S. Currency in JPMorgan Chase Bank Safe Deposit Bank in the Name of Travis James
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
U S A v. Mike's Auto Sales Inc Assets et al
as 5:2012cv02164
Defendant: Mikes Auto Sales Inc Assets , A-1 Auto Finance Co Assets , Mikes Auto Sales Inc Stock and others
Plaintiff: USA
Claimant: Citizens National Bank N A , William Paul Boyter , Jennifer Schultz Boyter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Three Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($360,000.00), et al
as 3:2011cv00703
Defendant: Three Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($360,000.00) Currently Deposited AFTRAK No. 72070003-01, Seized From A JP Morgan Chase Bank Account of Wilkerson Tax Service, and One Hundred Ten Thousand Do
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. 90,000 Seized From Delta Bank Acct XXX2374
as 3:2009cv02110
Defendant: 90000 Seized From Delta Bank Acct XXX2374
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?