Cases 1 - 4 of 4
United States of America v. Gould et al
as 1:2015cv01398
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alan Gould
Garnishee:
New York Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205
United States of America v. $65,000 in U.S. Currency et al
as 1:2013cv00773
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$65,000 in U.S. Currency, $167,600.00 in U.S. Currency, $7,110.00 in U.S. Currency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. Any and All Funds on Deposit in Bank of America, NA Account Number XXXX-XXXX-7128 in the Name of Jay Goldman and all Proceeds Traceable Thereto et al
as 1:2013cv00765
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Any and All Funds on Deposit in Bank of America, NA Account Number XXXX-XXXX-7128 in the Name of Jay Goldman and all Proceeds Traceable Thereto, Any and All Funds on Deposit in Bank of America, NA Account Number XXXX-XXXX-3313 in the Name of Alan J. Gould and all Proceeds Traceable Thereto, Any and All Funds on Deposit in Bank of America, NA Account Number XXXX-XXXX-1199 in the Name of Alan J. Gould and all Proceeds Traceable Thereto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. 8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy, Flor, et al
as 10-5061
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy, Florida 32351, One Condo Located On North Ocean Boulevard In Myrtle Beach, South Carolina and All Funds Including Approximately $53 Million, On Deposit At Bank Of America Accounts Of (1) Thomas A. Bowdoin, Jr., , (2) Clarence Busby, Jr. & Dawn Stowers,& (3) Golden Panda Ad Builder, Thomas A. Bowdoin, Jr., Sole Proprietor, dba Adsurfdaily; Clarenc
Claimant - Appellant:
Adsurfdaily, Inc., Thomas A. Bowdoin and Bowdoin Harris Enterprises, Inc.
Claimant - Appellee:
Golden Panda Ad Builder, Clarence Busby, Michael Haws and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
