Cases 1 - 3 of 3
United States of America v. Approximately 127,271 bitcoin (BTC) previously stored at the virtual currency addresses listed in Attachment A, and all proceeds traceable thereto
as 1:2025cv05745
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Fishbeck Claimants
Defendant:
Approximately 127,271 bitcoin (BTC) previously stored at the virtual currency addresses listed in Attachment A, and all proceeds traceable thereto
Claimant:
Zhi Chen, Warp Data Technology Lao Sole Co. Ltd, Ath Leepinyo and others
Interested Party:
Kristen Breitweiser, Caroline Breitweiser, Patricia Ryan and others
Cross-Complainant:
Caroline Breitweiser, Colin Ryan, Patricia Ryan and others
Cross-Defendant:
Approximately 127,271 bitcoin (BTC) previously stored at the virtual currency addresses listed in Attachment A, and all proceeds traceable thereto, Andy Yan, Zhi Chen and others
Counter-Claimant:
Hamen Claimants, Iranian Terrorism Victims, Refael Twersky and others
Counter-Defendant:
Andy Yan, Zhi Chen, Carlos Acosta, as Fiduciary for the Estate of Maria Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Poulos v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2022cv01326
Plaintiff:
Larry Poulos
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Heather Bradley, Ethan Commons Homeowners Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
United States of America v. Kaplan et al
as 2:2016cv02601
Defendant:
Any and all funds on deposit in Bank of America Account Number 898065992721 held in the names of Roger Kaplan and Karen Kaplan, Any and all funds on deposit in People's United Bank Account Number 1300011283 held in the names of Roger Kaplan and Karen Kaplan, Any and all funds on deposit in People's United Bank Account Number 9000027491 held in the names of Roger Kaplan and Karen Kaplan and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.