Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in District of Columbia
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SIX HUNDRED ONE THOUSAND, FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY-SIX DOLLARS AND NINETEEN CENTS ($601,426.19) OF FUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH DYNAPEX ENERGY LIMITED
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $601,426.19 OF FUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH DYNAPEX ENERGY LIMITED, $4,866,527.84 OF FUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH DYNAPEX ENERGY LIMITED, $160,810.94 ASSOCIATED WITH BINRIN LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $6,999,925.00 OF FUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH VELMUR MANAGEMENT PTE LTD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01705
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $6,999,925.00 OF FUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH VELMUR MANAGEMENT PTE LTD, VELMUR MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. and TRANSATLANTIC PARTNERS PTE. LTD
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $215,587.22 IN U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 100606401387436 HELD IN THE NAME OF JJ SZLAVIK COMPANIES, INC. AT CITIZENS BANK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00853
Defendant: $215,587.22 IN U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 100606401387436 HELD IN THE NAME OF JJ SZLAVIK COMPANIES, INC. AT CITIZENS BANK, $10,174.52 SEIZED FROM BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 2045233794 HELD IN THE NAME OF JOSEPH SZLAVIK AT WELLS FARGO BANK, $27,835.09 SEIZED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 873653221 AND $72,000 FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 784051843, BOTH HELD IN THE NAME OF JOSEPH SZLAVIK AT INVESTMENT AND TD AMERITRADE and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant: JOSEPH J. SZLAVIK and ANDREA SZLAVIK
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALL ASSETS HELD IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 80020796, IN THE NAME OF DORAVILLE PROPERTIES CORPORATION, AT DEUTSCHE BANK INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED IN JERSEY, CHANNEL ISLANDS, AND ALL INTEREST, BENEFITS OR ASSETS TR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01832
Claimant: ZAINAB SHINKAFI BAGUDU, IBRAHIM BAGUDU, GODSON M. NNAKA and others
Defendant: ALL ASSETS HELD IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 223406510PUSD, IN THE NAME OF STANDARD ALLIANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED AT BANQUE SBA, AND ALL INTEREST, BENEFITS, OR ASSETS TRACEABLE THERETO, STANDARD ALLIANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED, A BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CORPORATION, TOGETHER WITH ITS ASSETS AND ALL PROPERTY TRACEABLE THERTO, ALL ASSETS HELD IN THE INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO OF BLUE HOLDING (2) PTE. LTD., ON BEHALF OF OR TRACEABLE TO RIDLEY GROUP LIMITED, AND/OR THE RIDLEY TRUST AT J.O. HAMBRO INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED AND A and others
Interested Party: FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA and NNSKS & ASSOCIATES
Petitioner: FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA and EMMANUEL OGEBE
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
NOVAK v. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
as 1:2007mc00212
Plaintiff: DOMINIC NOVAK
Defendant: CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Respondent: JOHN HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceeding
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BELL
as 1:2007mc00103
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: GREGORY BELL
Movant: EDGEWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and EDGEWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Motion for Protective Order
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BELL
as 1:2007mc00069
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: GREGORY BELL
Movant: EDGEWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and PETE CLARK
Cause Of Action: Motion for Protective Order
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BALL
as 1:2007mc00034
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ANTWUAN BALL
Movant: EDGEWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BALL
as 1:2007mc00004
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ANTWUAN BALL
Movant: EDGEWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?