Cases 91 - 100 of 7,485
Arnold v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Bryan Arnold
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Talley v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Shekena Talley
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Board of Trustees of the NECA/IBEW Family Medical Care Plan v. Standard Electric Service, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the NECA/IBEW Family Medical Care Plan
Defendant:
Standard Electric Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
STEVENS v. 3 SQUARES DINER, LLC
as 7:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEVENS, JESSICA MCCALL, BRIANA PALMER and others
Defendant:
3 SQUARES DINER LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Henry v. Clayton County School District
as 1:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Karen Henry, Isaac R Britt and Jason Seda
Defendant:
Clayton County School District
Smith v. City of Hapeville et al
as 1:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
Freda B. Smith and Freda Smith
Defendant:
City of Hapeville and Richard Glavosek
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Moeller v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Tom Moeller
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
WARREN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
MANIKA WARREN
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2617 Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Powell et al v. Prescott et al
as 1:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Carole Powell, Melissa Hogans and Karim Salem
Defendant:
Christopher Prescott and Jason Prescott
MONTGOMERY v. TILE VENTURES INC
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
SABRINA MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
TLE VENTURES INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
