Cases 11 - 20 of 91
Baten et al v. 116 West 32 Cafe LLC et al
as 1:2019cv10873
Defendant:
116 West 32 Cafe LLC, Chong Ye Yang and Yhung Gyung Kang
Plaintiff:
Victor Baten and Hector David Quieju
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cruz et al v. West New Malaysia Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07994
Defendant:
Andy K Chong, West New Malaysia Restaurant Inc. and Tatali Doe
Plaintiff:
Netzahi Cruz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chen v. Lilis 200 West 57th Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv07654
Defendant:
Jonah Phillips, Lilis 200 West 57th Corp., Thean Choo Chong and others
Plaintiff:
Chang Yan Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Zhang v. Eurest Boeing et al
as 2:2019cv01220
Defendant:
Compass Group USA, Inc. at Boeing, Kris Villager, Lucia Flugencio and others
Plaintiff:
Chong Yu Zhang
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Bonilla et al v. Lex34 Fruit & Vegetable Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv05327
Plaintiff:
Angel Bonilla, Victor, Jesus Ramales and others
Defendant:
Mike Cho, Nicole Cho, Mike Chong and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kim v. Sushi Bell Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02847
Defendant:
Sushi Bell Inc. and Soonmyong Park
Plaintiff:
Chong Soo Kim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Osorto Escobar et al v. 27 Madison Avenue Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv02608
Defendant:
Chong Byun, 27 Madison Avenue Corp., Essen22, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Moises Osorto Escobar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nam et al v. Ichiba Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01222
Defendant:
David Ahn, Ichiba Inc. and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Chong Chol Nam and Myun Jae Ko
Pimentel v. 615 W. 176th St. LLC et al.
as 1:2019cv01374
Plaintiff:
Manuel Pimentel
Defendant:
615 W. 176th St. LLC and Chong S. Piper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cao et al v. Joy Luck Palace, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00925
Defendant:
Patrick Mok, Tak M Yee, Qing Wen Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Wood Chong Lee, Yan Hua Liu, Pei Yun Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.