Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Riley v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2012cv01502
Defendant:
Local 1219 UAW and Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Steven Riley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Spicer et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2010cv00450
Plaintiff:
Sam Spicer and Nick Wilson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Batavia Transmission, LLC, Uaw Local 863 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Helen Meluch, Administratix to the Estate of William Meluch v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2010cv00651
Defendant:
Danielle M. Edwards, John Does 1 through 5, Unicare and others
Plaintiff:
Helen Meluch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aaron v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2009cv02549
Defendant:
Visteon Corporation, Noble Grohe, Lacoya Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
Marla J. Aaron
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Ray et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2009cv00714
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Douglas Ray, Ricky Wheeler, Calvin Copley, Jr. and others
Defendant:
United Auto Workers, Local 1250 and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dillion v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2009cv00566
Plaintiff:
Michael Dillion
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Schulte et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2008cv00758
Plaintiff:
John Schulte and Kim Schulte
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Chance v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2008cv00576
Plaintiff:
Sandra Chance, Sandra Chance and Sandra Chance
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pincus v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2008cv00258
Plaintiff:
Arlene A. Pincus and Arlene A. Pincus
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Pincus v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2007cv02014
Plaintiff:
Arlene A. Pincus
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
