Cases 11 - 20 of 123
SMITH v. HILL-KELLY DODGE INC
as 3:2022cv04887
Plaintiff:
TONY L SMITH
Defendant:
HILL-KELLY DODGE INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Chambers-Hill v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Synetha Chambers-Hill
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Strickland v. G.M. Hill Engineering, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Harrison Eugene Strickland
Defendant:
G.M. Hill Engineering, Inc.
ORTIZ v. THE BEVERLY HILLS SPA & SALON LLC et al
as 0:2022cv60107
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ORTIZ
Defendant:
THE BEVERLY HILLS SPA & SALON LLC and HILBERT MOHABIR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MEADOWS v. HILL-KELLY DODGE, INC.
as 3:2021cv03697
Plaintiff:
TAMMY MEADOWS
Defendant:
HILL-KELLY DODGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MONROE SR. v. INTREPID DETOX RESIDENTIAL LLC et al
as 9:2021cv82021
Plaintiff:
SL MONROE SR.
Defendant:
INTREPID DETOX RESIDENTIAL LLC, CHAPEL HILL MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC doing business as Chapel Hill Medical Detox and REBECCA KHAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Monroe Sr. v. Intrepid Detox Residential LLC et al
as 9:2021cv82022
Plaintiff:
SL MONROE SR.
Defendant:
INTREPID DETOX RESIDENTIAL LLC, CHAPEL HILL MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC doing business as Chapel Hill Medical Detox and REBECCA KHAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Ben Hill Griffin, Inc. v. Anderson et al
as 8:2021cv02311
Plaintiff:
Ben Hill Griffin, Inc.
Defendant:
Lois L. Anderson, Sheenia Dannett Nealey, Adam "AJ" Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
HILL v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
as 1:2021cv21980
Plaintiff:
KENTREL HILL
Defendant:
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Dixon v. Baker-Hill Industries, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv60535
Defendant:
Matthew Ricci and Baker-Hill Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Dixon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
