Cases 11 - 18 of 18
BENITEZ et al v. Superior Laundry Services LLC et al
as 1:2014cv06058
Plaintiff:
JOSE BENITEZ, ELVIRA BOO CAAL, CANDIDO BRAN and others
Defendant:
Marvin Mordechai Halon and Superior Laundry Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Guzman v. Top Roofing & Construction Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03946
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Guzman
Defendant:
Top Roofing & Construction Group, Inc. and Krzysztof J. Pabis
Acuna et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00927
Plaintiff:
Vincent Acuna, Jr., Jorge Aguilar O.J.R., Brian Albrecht and others
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc., CMH Manufacturing, Inc. and Clayton Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Acuna et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00295
Plaintiff:
Vincent Acuna, Jr., Jorge Aguilar O.J.R., Brian Albrecht and others
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc., CMH Manufacturing, Inc. and Clayton Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Guzman et al v. Laredo Systems, Inc. et al.
as 1:2010cv01499
Plaintiff:
Jose Guzman , Jaime Mercado , Bernardo Mercado and others
Defendant:
Laredo Systems, Inc., Laredo Systems, LLC and Enrique Jaime
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Perez et al v. National Maintenance Group, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00230
Plaintiff:
Maria Perez and Jose Guzman
Defendant:
National Maintenance Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Estrella v. Coqui Check Cashing, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv05177
Plaintiff:
Dario Estrella and Dario Estrella
Defendant:
Coqui Check Cashing, Inc., JCG Check Cashing, Inc. and Jose Guzman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodriguez et al v. Frank Diehl Farms, Inc.
as 8:2007cv01998
Plaintiff:
Lot Abraham Rodriguez Rodriguez, Lot Abraham Rodriguez Rodriguez, Manuel Reyes Luevano and others
Defendant:
Frank Diehl Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
