Cases 11 - 16 of 16
CHASE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. FRP DOOR CONCEPTS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv06189
Plaintiff:
CHASE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
FRP DOOR CONCEPTS, INC. , NICHOLAS IRWIN, NICHOLAS SANTORO and others
Counter_claimant:
FRP DOOR CONCEPTS, INC.
Counter_defendant:
CHASE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
FREEMAN v. BRENNAN et al
as 2:2015cv01102
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO FREEMAN
Defendant:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN and AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION AFL-CIO, PITTSBURGH METRO AREA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DOUGLASS v. THE BOEING COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv01878
Plaintiff:
MEGAN DOUGLASS
Defendant:
THE BOEING COMPANY and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN v. HARTFORD ELEVATOR LLC et al
as 2:2009cv04868
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN and TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
Defendant:
HARTFORD ELEVATOR LLC and MEGAN DOWNEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Graham v. Enterprise Leasing Company et al
as 2:2009cv00833
Plaintiff:
Wayman F. Graham, II, Wayman F. Graham, II, Kristen Benson and others
Defendant:
Enterprise Leasing Company, Enterprise Leasing Company, Enterprise Leasing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
TOPOLOSKY v. ALCOA INC., et al
as 2:2007cv00792
Plaintiff:
GARY P. TOPOLOSKY and MEGAN L. TOPOLOSKY
Defendant:
ALCOA INC., RUSSELL W. PORTER, JR., THOMAS R. TREMPUS and others
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - ERISA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
