Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Laborers' Pension Fund et al v. MG-Plus Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03102
Defendant:
MG-Plus Construction, Inc. and Miguel Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
Laborers' Pension Fund , Laborers' Welfare Fund for the Health and Welfare Department of the Construction and General Laborers' District Council of Chicago Vicinity and James S. Jorgensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Gonzalez v. Tampa Food & Beverage, LLC
as 8:2013cv02316
Plaintiff:
Miguel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Tampa Food & Beverage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lavallade et al v. Bice of Chicago, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05942
Plaintiff:
Hugo Lavallade , Dierdre Fennessy , Jesus Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Bice of Chicago, Inc., 158 East Ontario Corp., Da Ecib, USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gonzalez v. Thomasville Retail, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00847
Plaintiff:
Miguel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Thomasville Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sencion et al v. Martina Landscaping, Inc
as 5:2012cv00768
Plaintiff:
Pablo B Sencion and Miguel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Martina Landscaping, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Torres et al v. Griffith Construction Corporation
as 2:2011cv00722
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Arevalo Torres , Olegario Cordova Garduno , Rosain Gomez DeLaCruz and others
Defendant:
Griffith Construction Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ponce de Leon et al v. Water & Fire Restoration LLC et al
as 1:2011cv03766
Plaintiff:
Juan Ponce de Leon , Scott Maldonado , Miguel Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Water & Fire Restoration LLC , Joseph Good, Albert C Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
URENA et al v. L.B.C. CORP, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv05283
Plaintiff:
KELVIN URENA, KIETH HALLIGAN, ROGER CHAVARRI and others
Defendant:
L.B.C. CORP, INC., BLACKSTONE CONSTRUCTION, INC. and "JOHN DOE"
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
