Labor Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 30 of 39
LUNENFELD v. CHIRO POWER, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv03867
Plaintiff: CINDY LUNENFELD
Defendant: CHIRO POWER, LLC , CHIRO POWER, LLC KEYSTONE HEALTH PLAN EAST FLEX HMO PLAN and COBRA CONTROL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS et al v. CENTURY ELEVATOR, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv03792
Defendant: CENTURY ELEVATOR, INC. and JOHN M. POWERS
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS and ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
DETTMER v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA et al
as 5:2011cv00454
Plaintiff: SUSIE DETTMER
Defendant: LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA , PENNSYLVANIA MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION INSURANCE COMPANY and THE PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DEPPENBROOK et al v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00134
Plaintiff: PAUL DEPPENBROOK, ED ANTHONSEN, JOHN E. ATKINSON and others
Defendant: PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN v. POWER ELEVATOR SERVICE, CO. et al
as 2:2010cv00152
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN and TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
Defendant: POWER ELEVATOR SERVICE, CO. and CHARLES W. POWER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
POWERS et al v. DOMINION PEOPLES NATURAL GAS COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv01392
Plaintiff: GERALD POWERS and UNITED GAS WORKERS' UNION, LOCAL 69, DIVISION I, UTILITY WORKERS' UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO
Defendant: DOMINION PEOPLES NATURAL GAS COMPANY, DOMINION RESOURCES, INC., DOMINION RESOURCES SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type: Labor None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01799
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE et al v. CAR-WIN CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00137
Plaintiff: BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE, BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant: CAR-WIN CONSTRUCTION, INC. and THOMAS CARROLL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
IBEW LOCAL NO. 56 VACATION FUND et al v. THAYER POWER AND COMMUNICATION LINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2008cv00270
Plaintiff: IBEW LOCAL NO. 56 VACATION FUND, NATIONAL LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE COUNCIL, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND and others
Defendant: THAYER POWER AND COMMUNICATION LINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE et al v. PHILLIPS ENTERPRISE, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv02237
Plaintiff: BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE, BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 PA/DE HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant: PHILLIPS ENTERPRISE, INC. and JAMES J. PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?