Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv06871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vargas v. Petco Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01561
Plaintiff:
Heather Vargas
Defendant:
Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. and Petco Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wagner et al v. County of Inyo
as 1:2017cv00969
Plaintiff:
Amanda Wagner and Heather Lind
Defendant:
County of Inyo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Basile v. Aaron Brothers, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00485
Plaintiff:
Heather Basile
Defendant:
Aaron Brothers, Inc. , Michaels Stores, Inc. and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Funk et al v. CEC Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
James Funk , Salvador Hernandez, Jr. , Heather Larsen and others
Defendant:
CEC Entertainment, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heather Smith v. CEC Entertainment, Inc.
as 2:2016cv09452
Defendant:
CEC Entertainment, Inc. and DOES
Plaintiff:
Heather Smith
Heather Smith v. CEC Entertainment, Inc.
as 8:2016cv02238
Defendant:
CEC Entertainment, Inc. and DOES
Plaintiff:
Heather Smith
Heather Becker v. Aerotek, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv01927
Defendant:
Aerotek Scientific, LLC, Aerotek, Inc., Allegis Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Becker
Chavez v. PVH Corporation
as 5:2013cv01797
Plaintiff:
Jessie Chavez
Defendant:
PVH Corporation, PVH Retail Stores, LLC and Tommy Hilfiger Retail, LLC
Petitioner:
Melissa Wiggs, Jodi Scott-George and ADP, LLC
Interested Party:
Jeffrey Lapan and Ashwin Chandra
Not Classified By Court:
Danah Lapan, Dakkar Hunter, Bryan Noriega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Craig v. Pacific Dental Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02399
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Craig
Defendant:
Pacific Dental Services, Inc. , Heather Dickerhoff , Cindy McAvene and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
