Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Nacy et al v. D.F.C. Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00331
Plaintiff:
James Nacy , Joseph Gladstone , Cole Tumberg and others
Defendant:
D.F.C. Enterprises, Inc. , Daniel F. Collins and Marti Windler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Operating Engineers Local 101 Pension Fund et al v. King Pipeline, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00154
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Local 101 Pension Fund , Operating Engineers Local 101 Health and Welfare Fund , Operating Engineers Local 101 Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
King Pipeline, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Greater Kansas City Laborers Pension Fund et al v. W R King Contracting Inc
as 4:2009cv00630
Plaintiff:
Greater Kansas City Laborers Pension Fund, Greater Kansas City Laborers Pension Fund, Leslie Williams and others
Defendant:
W R King Contracting Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Kansas City Cement Masons Pension Fund et al., vs. JW King & Sons Construction, LLC
as 4:2009cv00102
Plaintiff:
Kansas City Cement Masons Pension Fund, Kansas City Cement Masons Pension Fund, Kevin Sexton and others
Defendant:
JW King & Sons Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Van Sharp et al v. Power Line Consultants, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00076
Plaintiff:
Harry Van Sharp , David Hannah , Ray King and others
Defendant:
Power Line Consultants, LLC , Developers Surety and Indemnity Company , Mike Moll and others
Third_party_defendant:
Tonya Garrett and Hud Garrett
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Developers Surety and Indemnity Company
Cross_claimant:
Developers Surety and Indemnity Company and Sikeston Board of Municipal Utilities, City of Sikeston, Missouri
Cross_defendant:
Power Line Consultants, LLC and Developers Surety and Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Van Sharp et al v. Power Line Consultants, LLC et al
as 4:2008cv00142
Plaintiff:
Harry Van Sharp, Harry Van Sharp, David Hannah and others
Defendant:
Power Line Consultants, LLC, Developers Surety and Indemnity Company, Mike Moll and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Schoemehl et al vs. Renaissance Electric Company, Inc.
as 4:2007cv00287
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Schoemehl, Stephen P. Schoemehl, Eric Aschinger and others
Defendant:
Renaissance Electric Company, Inc., Daktronics, Inc. and Hunt Construction Group, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
King v. Schmidt, et al
as 4:2002cv01423
Plaintiff:
Sharon Sue King
Defendant:
Chantal Schmidt and Cardinal Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
