Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Regan et al v. Charleston SC, City of
as 2:2013cv03046
Plaintiff:
James Regan , Jesse Faircloth , Michael Pack and others
Defendant:
Charleston SC, City of
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Smith et al v. Intersouth Management Inc
as 2:2012cv02457
Plaintiff:
Donna Smith and Ashley Smith Matthews
Defendant:
Intersouth Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Floyd v. Bi-Lo LLC
as 6:2011cv02358
Plaintiff:
Matthew Floyd
Defendant:
Bi-Lo LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hawkins v. Conner et al
as 6:2011cv01743
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Hawkins
Defendant:
Olin D Conner, Jr , Winn-Dixie Stores Inc and Winn-Dixie Stores Inc Profit Sharing 401K Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Matthews v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 4:2011cv01021
Plaintiff:
Debbie Matthews
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Holmes v. RNDC-South Carolina LLC et al
as 6:2010cv01174
Plaintiff:
Matthew Holmes
Defendant:
RNDC-South Carolina LLC and RNDC-South Carolina LLC Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Draude et al v. Payne
as 2:2009cv03203
Plaintiff:
Matthew Draude and Samantha Draude
Defendant:
Michael Chase Payne
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Baxley v. SB Mulch Inc et al
as 4:2009cv02287
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Baxley
Defendant:
SB Mulch Inc, SB Mulch Inc, Landscape Outlet Store and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Spencer v. TEB Inc Employee Benefit Plan
as 6:2008cv01567
Plaintiff:
Matthew Spencer
Defendant:
TEB Inc Employee Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rose v. Hartford Life Insurance Company
as 8:2007cv01824
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rose
Defendant:
Hartford Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
