Cases 21 - 30 of 105
IVERSON v. SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP. et al
as 3:2020cv06278
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP., AMANDA FEKETE and others
Plaintiff:
OLIVIA IVERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEE et al v. HANOK 18, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv05409
Plaintiff:
MOO SEOK LEE, STEVEN LEE and MI HYUN YOO
Defendant:
HANOK 18, LLC, XYZ CORP. 1-10, GEORGE ODZELASHVILI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEE et al v. HANOK 18, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv05409
Plaintiff:
MOO SEOK LEE, STEVEN LEE and MI HYUN YOO
Defendant:
HANOK 18, LLC, XYZ CORP. 1-10, GEORGE ODZELASHVILI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beckerman v. Fresh Digital Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01530
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-10, Fresh Digital Group, Inc., Doug Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Sophie Beckerman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MCCALLUM v. PROACTIVE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv20932
Defendant:
GreenRG Management, Alfred Heyer, Jr, Proactive Lighting Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur McCallum and MARK MCCALLUM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Rvalov v. Themefood Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10638
Plaintiff:
Andrei Rvalov
Defendant:
Live Bait, Charles Milite, Themefood Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BOLLINGER v. INFOTECH SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINESS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv19509
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, XYZ CORP 1-10, MATTI KON and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN BOLLINGER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
ROE v. THE ARC MERCER et al
as 3:2019cv19084
Defendant:
LRV CONSULTING, INC, THE ARC MERCER, XYZ CORPS (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
AMY ROE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cho v. Osaka Zen Spa et al
as 1:2019cv07935
Defendant:
Nan Hi Lee, Joshia Lee, Boksil Paula Lee and others
Plaintiff:
So Young Cho
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ELEY v. MONTCLAIR HOSPITAL, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv13240
Defendant:
SODEXO USA, ALLEN REIGERT, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ELEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
