Cases 31 - 37 of 37
LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BENEFIT FUNDS et al v. G. ANTONINI CONSTRUCTION
as 2:2007cv04673
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BENEFIT FUNDS and ALAN R. PARHAM
Defendant:
G. ANTONINI CONSTRUCTION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BENEFIT FUNDS et al v. A.B. AND S. MASONRY CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv03093
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BENEFIT FUNDS and ALAN R. PARHAM
Defendant:
A.B. AND S. MASONRY CORPORATION and KEVIN J. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BENEFIT FUNDS et al v. DEL LANDSCAPING SERVICES et al
as 2:2007cv02695
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BENEFIT FUNDS and ALAN R. PARHAM
Defendant:
DEL LANDSCAPING SERVICES and LINDA DEL MONTE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BENEFIT FUNDS et al v. P. SANTOS CO., INC. et al
as 2:2007cv02125
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BENEFIT FUNDS and ALAN R. PARHAM
Defendant:
P. SANTOS CO., INC. and NICK CARLINO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BENEFIT FUNDS et al v. INTERGEO SERVICES
as 2:2007cv02093
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BENEFIT FUNDS and ALAN R. PARHAM
Defendant:
INTERGEO SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1337 E.R.I.S.A.
LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BENEFIT FUNDS et al v. HART DECONSTRUCTION
as 2:2007cv01704
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BENEFIT FUNDS and ALAN R. PARHAM
Defendant:
HART DECONSTRUCTION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Quiroz v. Phoenix Three Restaurants Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv01592
Plaintiff:
Enrique Castillo Quiroz
Defendant:
Phoenix Three Restaurants Inc. and Brian Lewis
Mediator:
Alan R. Berkowitz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
