Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Sablan v. Holland, et al
as 1:2012cv01198
Plaintiff:
Amanda J. Sablan and Donna F. Williams
Defendant:
Richard Holland and Jo Ann Holland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Walker v. Pluribus Products
as 3:2012cv00859
Plaintiff:
Dee Anne Walker
Defendant:
Pluribus Products
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Walker v. Phoenix Custom Furniture
as 3:2012cv00534
Plaintiff:
Dee Anne Walker
Defendant:
Phoenix Custom Furniture
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Wade v. Center for Workforce Learning, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00223
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wade
Defendant:
Center for Workforce Learning, Inc. and Mary Ann Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Walker v. Glendale Products Co., Division of Terminal Craftsmen, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00420
Plaintiff:
Dee Anne Walker
Defendant:
Glendale Products Co., Division of Terminal Craftsmen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Mathis v. Office Furniture Services
as 3:2012cv00384
Plaintiff:
Dee Anne Mathis
Defendant:
Office Furniture Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Yambrick v. Metropolitan Transit Authority et al
as 3:2012cv00032
Plaintiff:
Mollie Ann McNeese Yambrick
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transit Authority and Davidson Transit Organization
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
West et al v. Berkline, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00110
Plaintiff:
Richard West , Tammy Dalton , Donna Campbell and others
Defendant:
Berkline, LLC , Berkline Benchcraft Holdings, LLC and Sun Capital Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Walker et al v. Vitobob Furniture
as 3:2010cv00742
Plaintiff:
Dee Anne Walker and The United Furniture Workers Pension Plan A
Defendant:
Vitobob Furniture
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Redmond v. Tennessee Proad Contractors, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00172
Plaintiff:
James M Redmond
Defendant:
Tennessee Proad Contractors, LLC, Chris Raymond, Bethanie P Raymond and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
