Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Connolly v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.
as 1:2017cv11711
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Connolly
Defendant:
Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McGrath et al v. City of Somerville
as 1:2017cv10979
Plaintiff:
Michael McGrath , Robert Akenbauer , Michael Ameral and others
Defendant:
City of Somerville
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Walker v. Osterman Propane LLC et al
as 1:2017cv10416
Plaintiff:
Daniel Walker
Defendant:
Osterman Propane LLC and Vincent Osterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rocheville et al v. Trustees of Boston University
as 1:2017cv10313
Plaintiff:
Scott Rocheville , Brian G. Abdallah , Paul Arnold and others
Defendant:
Trustees of Boston University
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union et al v. MBTA
as 1:2016cv12486
Plaintiff:
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union , John Mooneyhan , Shara Daniels and others
Defendant:
MBTA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union et al v. MBTA
as 1:2016cv12488
Plaintiff:
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union and Daniel Shea
Defendant:
MBTA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Vinton v. Tu Moda Spa for Beauty & Wellness, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11733
Defendant:
Tu Moda Spa for Beauty & Wellness, Inc. and Josue Rosa
Plaintiff:
Danielle Vinton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Vinton v. Tu Moda Spa for Beauty & Wellness, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv11733
Defendant:
Tu Moda Spa for Beauty & Wellness, Inc. and Josue Rosa
Plaintiff:
Danielle Vinton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Tracey et al v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology et al
as 1:2016cv11620
Plaintiff:
David Tracey , Daniel Guenther , Maria Nicholson and others
Defendant:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology , The MIT Supplemental 401(K) Plan Oversight Committee , The Administrative Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Holway v. Town of Acton
as 1:2016cv11611
Plaintiff:
Daniel Holway
Defendant:
Town of Acton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
