Labor Cases filed in Washington
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Employee Painters' Trust Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Handle Construction Company et al
as 2:2011cv00283
Plaintiff: Employee Painters' Trust Health and Welfare Fund and International Union of Painters and Allied Trades National Pension Fund
Defendant: Handle Construction Company , Marc Marlow and Jane Doe Marlow
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund et al v. Garland Barcom
as 2:2009cv05099
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, Trustees of the Local Union 598 Supplemental Pension Plan, Trustees of the Washington State Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Pension Plan and others
Defendant: Garland Barcom
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Type: Labor None
Employee Painters Trust Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Contract Decorators of Idaho Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00060
Plaintiff: Employee Painters Trust Health & Welfare Fund and International Union of Painters and Allied Trades National Pension Fund
Defendant: Contract Decorators of Idaho Inc, John M Clark and June M Clark
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Board of Trustees of the Northwest Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry Health et al v. Fluidynamics USA, LLC
as 2:2008cv01490
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Northwest Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry Health, Welfare & Vacation Trust, Washington State Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry Pension Trust and others
Defendant: Fluidynamics USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Board of Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund et al v. Ram Piping Industries Inc
as 2:2008cv05048
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, Local Union 598 Supplemental Pension Plan, Washington State Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Pension Plan and others
Defendant: Ram Piping Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund et al v. IV Rivers Inc
as 2:2007cv05077
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, Trustees of the Local Union 598 Supplemental Pension Plan, Trustees of the Washington State Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Pension Plan and others
Defendant: IV Rivers Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund et al v. Sagebrush Concrete Sawing & Drilling Inc
as 2:2007cv05076
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, Trustees of the Local Union 598 Supplemental Pension Plan, Trustees of the Washington State Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Pension Plan and others
Defendant: Sagebrush Concrete Sawing & Drilling Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Board of Trustees of the Seattle Area Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry Health & Welfare Trust et al v. Granston Mechanical LLC et al
as 2:2007cv01793
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Seattle Area Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry Health & Welfare Trust, Seattle Area Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry Journeymen and Apprentice Training Trusts, Plumbers & Pipefitters of Local 32 Vacation Fund and others
Defendant: Granston Mechanical LLC, PCL Construction Services Inc, Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund et al v. Ram Piping Industries Inc
as 2:2007cv05021
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, Trustees of the Local Union 598 Supplemental Pension Plan, Trustees of the Washington State Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Pension Plan and others
Defendant: Ram Piping Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?