Labor Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
SHIELDS v. AMERICAN MERCHANDISING SPECIALISTS, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00891
Plaintiff: MARK SHIELDS
Defendant: AMERICAN MERCHANDISING SPECIALISTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Type: Labor Plaintiff
SCHOONMAKER et al v. HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00703
Plaintiff: STEVEN LAWRENCE SCHOONMAKER and MICHAEL SCHOONMAKER
Defendant: HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD and HIGHMARK, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
CICIRETTI v. HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
as 2:2009cv00013
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY J. CICIRETTI
Defendant: HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
GELSDORF v. GELSDORF et al
as 2:2008cv00152
Plaintiff: KELLIE GELSDORF
Defendant: SCOTT GELSDORF, HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD, HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD and others
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - ERISA
Borger et al v. Highmark Blue Shield et al
as 3:2007cv02210
Plaintiff: James Borger, James Borger, Shirley Borger and others
Defendant: Highmark Blue Shield and Fulton Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BRUZDA v. HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
as 2:2007cv01592
Plaintiff: DAVID J. BRUZDA
Defendant: HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - ERISA
KELLY v. HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
as 2:2007cv01275
Plaintiff: J. CRILLEY KELLY and J. CRILLEY KELLY
Defendant: HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
GARFINKEL et al v. HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
as 2:2007cv01142
Plaintiff: ELI GARFINKEL, DAN GARFINKEL and NANCY GARFINKEL
Defendant: HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?