Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Sims v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada et al
as 6:2015cv00821
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Sims
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Anderson v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 4:2014cv03632
Plaintiff:
Barbara J Anderson
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Baldwin v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 6:2014cv03631
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Baldwin
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Strong v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 3:2014cv03039
Plaintiff:
Johnny Strong
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Drake v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada et al
as 6:2014cv02743
Plaintiff:
Ruth Drake
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Kelley v. Oconee Medical Center et al
as 8:2013cv02564
Plaintiff:
Angela Kelley
Defendant:
Oconee Medical Center and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Turner v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 4:2013cv01087
Plaintiff:
Josephine Turner
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Wesley v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 9:2012cv02310
Plaintiff:
Leroy Wesley
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bennefield v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada et al
as 6:2012cv01782
Plaintiff:
Clinton Bennefield
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada , Roechling Automotive Duncan LLP and Roechling Automotive Life Insurance Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Tandy v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 6:2011cv03089
Plaintiff:
Nolan Tandy
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
