Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Ikeme et al v. Waste Pro USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv01304
Plaintiff:
SHARWIN CARTER, ELIJIAH REID IV,, DEMARIO SIMS and others
Defendant:
WASTE PRO OF SOUTH CAROLINA, WASTE PRO OF NORTH CAROLINA and WASTE PRO USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Howard et al v. Waste Pro USA, Inc et al
as 6:2020cv01339
Defendant:
WASTE PRO OF LOUISIANA INC., WASTE PRO USA, INC, WASTE PRO OF ALABAMA INC. and others
Plaintiff:
BERNIE HOWARD, JORDAN FINN, ROLLEN STERLING and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Blandon v. Waste Pro USA, Inc.
as 6:2019cv02420
Plaintiff:
Dodd Blandon
Defendant:
Waste Pro USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WRIGHT v. WASTE PRO USA, INC. et al
as 0:2019cv62051
Defendant:
WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA, INC. and WASTE PRO USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WRIGHT, Randolph Mobley, Shawn Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Wright v. Waste Pro USA, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv62049
Defendant:
Waste Pro of Florida, Inc. and Waste Pro USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wright
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Wright v. Waste Pro USA, INC. et al
as 0:2019cv62044
Defendant:
Waste Pro of Florida, Inc. and Waste Pro USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wright
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Thomas et al v. Waste Pro USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02254
Plaintiff:
Alfred W. Thomas , Edward Allen and Dodd Blandon
Defendant:
Waste Pro USA, Inc. , Waste Pro of Florida, Inc. and Delta Sanitation of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GREEN v. WASTE PRO USA INC
as 4:2017cv00267
Plaintiff:
RODNEY GREEN
Defendant:
WASTE PRO USA INC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Benvenuto v. Waste Pro USA, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14299
Plaintiff:
Joseph Benvenuto
Defendant:
Waste Pro USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Riddle v. Waste Pro USA, Inc.
as 6:2011cv01593
Plaintiff:
Michael Riddle
Defendant:
Waste Pro USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
