Cases 41 - 50 of 116
Nazar v. Shoreline Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03444
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nazar
Defendant:
Shoreline Properties, Inc., Vaughn H Lynch and Keti Lynch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Suttell v. American Substance Abuse Professional, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01414
Plaintiff:
Danielle Suttell
Defendant:
American Substance Abuse Professional, Inc. and Carrie Frazier
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Campasino v. Manheim Remarketing Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00641
Defendant:
Manheim Remarketing Inc. and Cox Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Campasino
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Yassa et al v. EM Consulting Group, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00593
Plaintiff:
George Yassa , Eric Arnicar , David Bates and others
Defendant:
EM Consulting Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duncan v. Rodgers et al
as 8:2017cv00453
Plaintiff:
Daniel Duncan
Defendant:
George E Rodgers, Jr., RBS Maryland, LLC and Rodgers Brothers Custodial Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Duncan v. Rodgers et al
as 1:2017cv00453
Plaintiff:
Daniel Duncan
Defendant:
George E Rodgers, Jr., RBS Maryland, LLC and Rodgers Brothers Custodial Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Shryock v. Bed, Bath & Beyond, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03610
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shryock
Defendant:
Bed, Bath & Beyond, Inc. and Bed, Bath & Beyond of Towson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Atkin v. Goldberg's New York Bagels et al
as 8:2015cv03413
Plaintiff:
Daniel Atkin
Defendant:
Goldberg's New York Bagels and Daniel Keleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Toole v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02930
Plaintiff:
Danielle Toole
Defendant:
Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ricks et al v. National Institutes of Health et al
as 8:2015cv02822
Plaintiff:
Vicky S. Ricks and Louis Ricks, III
Defendant:
National Institutes of Health , Health and Human Services , Secretary Burwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
