Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Armanca v. Yates Service Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00441
Plaintiff:
Daniel Armanca
Defendant:
Yates Service Inc. and Jason Yates
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lopez v. Woodlawn Enterprise, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00248
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lopez
Defendant:
Woodlawn Enterprise, LLC, Daniel B. Choi, Pyoung R. Choi and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Amaya v. DTI International, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01412
Plaintiff:
Yoni A. Amaya
Defendant:
DTI International, Inc., Daniel B. Choi, Pyoung R. Choi and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hernandez v. Metro Greenfield, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01413
Plaintiff:
Cristobal Yovany Hernandez
Defendant:
Metro Greenfield, LLC, Daniel B. Choi, Pyoung R. Choi and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bava v. Combined Insurance Company of America
as 1:2014cv01026
Plaintiff:
Daniele Bava
Defendant:
Combined Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Devine et al v. City of Hampton, Virginia
as 4:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Devine , Nathaniel Adibi , William L. Alexander and others
Defendant:
City of Hampton, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mejia et al v. CD Carpentry Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00740
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mejia , Jose Ramirez , Santos Ramirez and others
Defendant:
CD Carpentry Inc., Phyllis Dolly and Carl W. Dolly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Allen et al v. Cogent Communications, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00459
Plaintiff:
Mark Ryan Allen , Scott Bimba , David Blackwell and others
Defendant:
Cogent Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ward v. AETNA Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ward
Defendant:
AETNA Life Insurance Company and Capital One Financial Corp. Employee Welfare Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Wickham v. Hi-Tech Asphalt Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00152
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Wickham
Defendant:
Hi-Tech Asphalt Solutions, Inc. and Carlos Usuda
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
