Cases 41 - 48 of 48
THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. THE ESTATE OF RAVI R. REDDY et al
as 2:2010cv01048
Plaintiff:
THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THE ESTATE OF RAVI R. REDDY and THE RAVI R. REDDY, M.D. P.A. PENSION PLAN AND TRUST
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
FINE v. GUARDIAN FIRST FUNDING GROUP, LLC
as 2:2010cv01956
Plaintiff:
BARRY FINE
Defendant:
GUARDIAN FIRST FUNDING GROUP, LLC
Counter_claimant:
GUARDIAN FIRST FUNDING GROUP, LLC
Counter_defendant:
BARRY FINE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BRITTINGHAM et al v. MURRY'S DEGREE et al
as 2:2009cv05786
Plaintiff:
DENISE BRITTINGHAM
Defendant:
MURRY'S DEGREE, MT AIRY SEPTA STATION, PNC BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DUBRAWSKY v. THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv01378
Plaintiff:
HENRY DUBRAWSKY
Defendant:
THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
MCGEOCH v. GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. et al
as 2:2009cv03366
Plaintiff:
JAMES MCGEOCH
Defendant:
GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. and STEPHANIE DIXON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
MARTELLACCI v. THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2008cv02541
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP MARTELLACCI
Defendant:
THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. PRONDZINSKI et al
as 2:2008cv00377
Plaintiff:
GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HELEN C. PRONDZINSKI, THE ESTATE OF PAUL E. PRONDZINSKI, MIGNONETTE A. AGUSTINO-FLORA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Maira v. The Guardian Insurance Company of America
as 3:2008cv00207
Plaintiff:
Andrea Maira
Defendant:
The Guardian Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
