Cases 41 - 48 of 48
APPELBAUM et al v. PHILLIPS INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 1:2009cv00990
Plaintiff:
STUART APPELBAUM, LENORE MILLER, HENRY JENKINS and others
Defendant:
PHILLIPS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
United Food and Commercial Workers v. Miller Grocery Market LLC
as 2:2009cv00199
Plaintiff:
Local 881 United Food and Commercial Workers
Defendant:
Miller Grocery Market LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
DITTO v. MILLER BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC
as 2:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL DITTO
Defendant:
MILLER BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
VANOVER v. GARFF RICHMOND, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00606
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA VANOVER
Defendant:
GARFF RICHMOND, LLC, DAVID MILLER and QUYEN WOLFE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
THOMPSON v. MILLER TRANSPORTATION BUS SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2009cv00571
Plaintiff:
GARRETT THOMPSON
Defendant:
MILLER TRANSPORTATION BUS SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
CARIE et al v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
as 1:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
STACY M. CARIE, STACY M. CARIE, LE C. HOOK and others
Defendant:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United Food and Commercial Workers v. Miller Grocery Market LLC
as 2:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Local 881 United Food and Commercial Workers and Local 881 United Food and Commercial Workers
Defendant:
Miller Grocery Market LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
SHORT et al v. MILLER
as 1:2007cv01304
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. SHORT and INDIANA STATE DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LABORERS AND HOD CARRIERS WELFARE, PENSION AND TRAINING FUNDS
Defendant:
CRAIG MILLER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
