Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Davenport v. Wendy's International Inc., et al
as 2:2013cv02159
Defendant:
Wendy's International, Inc. , The Wendy's Company and Wendy's Restaurants, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mitch Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Board of Trustees of the Ken Lusby Clerks etc vs Piedmont Lumber et al
as 3:2013cv03898
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Ken Lusby Clerks & Lumber Handlers Pension Fund
Defendant:
Piedmont Lumber & Mill Company , William C. Myer, Jr. and Wendy M Oliver
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hohu v. Hatch
as 3:2012cv04906
Plaintiff:
Linda Hohu
Defendant:
Wendy Hatch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
In Re Estate of John K Hohu aka John Hohu
as 8:2012cv01067
Respondent:
Does and Linda Hohu
Petitioner:
Wendy Hatch
Estate Of:
John K Hohu aka John Hohu
Martin Sheen et al v. Screen Actors Guild et al
as 2:2012cv01468
Plaintiff:
Peter Antico, Edward Asner, Renee Aubry and others
Defendant:
Amy Aquino, Does, David Hartley-Margolin and others
Miller v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
as 3:2012cv00241
Plaintiff:
Wendy Miller
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Group Long Term Disability Plan for Employees of Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wendi Berndt et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2011cv08579
Plaintiff:
Luis Alvarado, Wendi Berndt, Ralph Camarillo and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Katherine Lopez v. Wendy's International Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01555
Defendant:
Renzo Barbuena, Does and Wendy's International Inc
Plaintiff:
Katherine Lopez
Wendy Veneta Hillis v. Sensio Inc et al
as 2:2011cv05050
Defendant:
DOES, Elite Group Inc, Shae Hong and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Veneta Hillis
Maher Habashy et al v. Farmers Group Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01526
Defendant:
Wendy Cochran, Does, David Ehrlich and others
Plaintiff:
Maher Habashy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
