Cases 51 - 60 of 107
O'TOOLE et al v. NEXUS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
as 2:2019cv00745
Plaintiff:
REGIS CLAUS and MARTIN O'TOOLE
Defendant:
NEXUS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MARTIN v. RONAK FOODS LLC et al
as 5:2019cv02625
Defendant:
KRUPA PATEL, RONAK FOODS LLC and JIGNESH PANDYA
Plaintiff:
COREY MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
O'TOOLE et al v. FAYETTE PLUMBING SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2019cv00626
Plaintiff:
REGIS CLAUS and MARTIN O'TOOLE
Defendant:
FAYETTE PLUMBING SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SCALIA v. EAST PENN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
as 5:2018cv01194
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, EUGENE SCALIA, Acting Sec of Labor MILTON AL STEWART and others
Defendant:
EAST PENN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner:
YUASA BATTERY, INC., ENERSYS DELAWARE, INC. and EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
MORA BEDOLLA et al v. BRANDOLINI et al
as 2:2018cv00146
Plaintiff:
JOSE LUIS MORA BEDOLLA and ANDRES MARTIN JURADO PEREZ
Defendant:
LEWIS J. BRANDOLINI, III and BRANDOLINI COMPANIES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WHITFIELD v. LEON RAY MARTIN EXCAVATING, INC.
as 5:2017cv04785
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WHITFIELD
Defendant:
LEON RAY MARTIN EXCAVATING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
O'TOOLE et al v. D.J. HANNON & SONS, INC.
as 2:2017cv01120
Plaintiff:
MARTIN O'TOOLE and REGIS CLAUS
Defendant:
D.J. HANNON & SONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
O'TOOLE et al v. NEXUS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
as 2:2017cv00812
Plaintiff:
MARTIN O'TOOLE and REGIS CLAUS
Defendant:
NEXUS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ROSEN et al v. AIDS CARE GROUP
as 2:2017cv02751
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY ROSEN and PETER MARTIN
Defendant:
AIDS CARE GROUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
O'TOOLE et al v. R&B CONTRACTING & EXCAVATING, INC.
as 2:2017cv00633
Plaintiff:
MARTIN O'TOOLE and REGIS CLAUS
Defendant:
R&B CONTRACTING & EXCAVATING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
