Cases 51 - 60 of 597
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Elbert Williams v. Udelhoven Oilfield System Services, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Elbert Griffin Williams
Defendant:
Udelhoven Oilfield System Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
El-Shabazz et al v. Gulf Coast Hotel Management Inc.
as 4:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
Thomas El-Shabazz and Eligah Williams
Defendant:
Gulf Coast Hotel Management Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Payne v. TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
William Allen Payne
Defendant:
TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Brown et al v. Peanut Plumbing, LLC
as 1:2021cv01155
Plaintiff:
Todd Brown and William Cox
Defendant:
Peanut Plumbing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vazquez v. Brooks
as 4:2021cv00954
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Olvera Vazquez
Defendant:
William F. Brooks doing business as New Beginnings Steel Erection
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Snell v. Sollows
as 4:2021cv01256
Plaintiff:
Tamara Snell
Defendant:
William E. Gene Sollows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Comeaux v. Directional Project Support, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00887
Plaintiff:
Mark Comeaux
Defendant:
Directional Project Support, Inc. and William Gardner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sessions v. Directional Project Support, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Sessions
Defendant:
Directional Project Support, Inc. and William Gardner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Landry v. Directional Project Support, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00886
Plaintiff:
Derrell Landry
Defendant:
Directional Project Support, Inc. and William Gardner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
