Cases 61 - 70 of 195
Nogales v. Global Courier Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv21222
Defendant:
Heriberto Cazanas and Global Courier Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carlos Antonio Pavon Nogales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Polk v. Hass Interests, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv01149
Plaintiff:
POLK AUBREY
Defendant:
HASS Interests, LLC d/b/a Texas Executive Couriers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carter et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv01124
Plaintiff:
Eweren Mejia, James Kennedy, III, Rufus Davis, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JOHNSON v. RIGHTWAY COURIER, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01000
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
RICHARD FORSYTH and RIGHTWAY COURIER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ALMANZA v. ASAP COURIER & LOGISTICS, LLC
as 0:2019cv60458
Defendant:
ASAP COURIER & LOGISTICS, LLC
Plaintiff:
LOIDA ALMANZA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
TAHBOUT v. ESHAI CORP et al
as 2:2019cv00698
Plaintiff:
MUSTAPHA TAHBOUT
Defendant:
ESHAI CORP and COURIER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pruitt et al v. Act Fast Delivery, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00049
Defendant:
Act Fast Courier of Texas, Inc., Act Fast Delivery, Inc., Act Fast of Coastal Bend, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Huntsberry, Karen Lawson, Ayan Nur and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Da Silva v. South Florida Courier Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv20227
Plaintiff:
Djalma Lourenco Da Silva
Defendant:
Gonzalo Ochoa and South Florida Courier Systems, Inc.
Dimery v. HASS Interests, LLC
as 4:2018cv04725
Defendant:
HASS Interests, LLC d/b/a Texas Executive Couriers and HAAS Interests, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kirk Dimery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sobrinho v. South Florida Courier Systems, Inc. et al
as 9:2018cv80634
Plaintiff:
Jean Carlos Sobrinho
Defendant:
South Florida Courier Systems, Inc. and Gonzalo Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
