Labor Cases filed in California
Cases 61 - 70 of 79
Uriarte v. City of Calexico et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00498
Plaintiff: Frank Uriarte
Defendant: City of Calexico and ROES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Richard M. Widom v. Stockwell Harris Widom Woolverton & Muehl et al
as 2:2010cv01599
Defendant: Does 1-10, Edward Muehl, George Woolverton and others
Counter Defendant: Law Offices of Richard M Widom LLP and Roes
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Stockwell Harris Widom Woolverton & Muehl
Plaintiff: Richard M Widom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guerriero et al v. Hollywood Entertainment Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv02847
Plaintiff: Mario Guerriero and ROES
Defendant: Hollywood Entertainment Corporation, Game Crazy and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Type: Labor None
Community Convalescent Hospital of La Mesa v. Harrison
as 3:2009cv01271
Plaintiff: Community Convalescent Hospital of La Mesa
Defendant: Mildred Harrison
Cross Claimant: Mildred Harrison
Cross Defendant: Retiree Medical Benefits, Employee Welfare Benefits Committe, Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type: Labor Both
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Erik Wentzell Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv01027
Plaintiff: Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company, Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company and Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Defendant: Erik Wentzell Inc, Erik John Wentzell and American Contractors Indemnity Company
Counter Defendant: Southern Counties Construction Services Inc, ROES and Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Counter Claimant: American Contractors Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
The Petersen Law Firm et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2009cv02344
Petitioner: The Petersen Law Firm, The Petersen Law Firm, The Petersen Law Firm and others
Respondent: City of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporatiion et al v. Robert Timothy Ortiz et al
as 5:2009cv00523
Plaintiff: Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporatiion, Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporatiion, Board of Trustees for the Carpenters Southwest Trusts and others
Defendant: Robert Timothy Ortiz, Surety Company of the Pacific and DOES
Cross Claimant: American Contractors Indemnity Company
Cross Defendant: Pre Fab Installation, ROES and Robert Timothy Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
California Business Bureau Inc v. Vanessa Flores et al
as 8:2009cv00192
Plaintiff: California Business Bureau Inc
Defendant: Vanessa Flores and Doe
Cross Claimant: Vanessa Serrano
Cross Defendant: Southwest Carpenters Health and Welfare Trust, Southwest Carpenters Health and Welfare Trust, Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mook et al v. Regis Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00118
Plaintiff: Cory James Mook and Roes 1 through 10
Defendant: Regis Corporation and 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Both
Contemporary Services Corporation et al v. Lori Jo Hartman et al
as 2:2008cv02967
Plaintiff: Contemporary Services Corporation, Protatech, Inc. and Cultural Protection Property Group
Defendant: Lori Jo Hartman and DOES 1 TO 20, inclusive
Counter Defendant: Roes 1 to 20 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Labor Labor: Other

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?