Cases 81 - 90 of 230
UNIVERSITY SPINE CENTER v. AETNA, INC.
as 2:2018cv00682
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY SPINE CENTER
Defendant:
AETNA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
UNIVERSITY SPINE CENTER v. AETNA, INC.
as 2:2018cv00680
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY SPINE CENTER
Defendant:
AETNA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
THE KAPLAN CENTER FOR PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY v. AETNA, INC.
as 2:2018cv00478
Plaintiff:
THE KAPLAN CENTER FOR PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
Defendant:
AETNA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cox et al v. Amend et al.
as 2:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
Stephenie Cox and Kevin Cox
Defendant:
Michael L Amend , State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Aetna Inc and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cross_claimant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cross_defendant:
Michael L Amend
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
FUTURE CARE CONSULTANTS, LLC et al v. AETNA INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00241
Plaintiff:
MARLENE ESTRADA and FUTURE CARE CONSULTANTS, LLC
Defendant:
AETNA INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
COMPLETE FOOT AND ANKLE v. AETNA, INC.
as 2:2017cv13733
Plaintiff:
COMPLETE FOOT AND ANKLE
Defendant:
AETNA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
LI Neuroscience Specialists v. Aetna, Inc.
as 1:2017cv07513
Defendant:
Aetna, Inc.
Plaintiff:
LI Neuroscience Specialists
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
UNIVERSITY SPINE CENTER v. AETNA, INC.
as 2:2017cv13654
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY SPINE CENTER
Defendant:
AETNA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
LI Neuroscience Specialists v. Aetna, Inc.
as 1:2017cv07514
Defendant:
Aetna, Inc.
Plaintiff:
LI Neuroscience Specialists
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LI Neuroscience Specialists v. Aetna, Inc.
as 2:2017cv07513
Defendant:
Aetna, Inc.
Plaintiff:
LI Neuroscience Specialists
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
