Cases 1 - 10 of 16
RITTER v. GREASE STOP, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv01343
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RITTER
Defendant:
GREASE STOP, LLC and GREG FISHER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
FISHER v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv02548
Plaintiff:
ROSALIND FISHER
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SCHOLTZ et al v. CONCORDVILLE OPERATING GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02078
Defendant:
HEM MANAGEMENT, INC., ARAMINGO OPERATING GROUP, INC., CONCORDVILLE OPERATING GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA FISHER and BOBBIE SCHOLTZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fisher v. Cable Services Company, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00455
Plaintiff:
Karen Fisher
Defendant:
Cable Services Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SERRETTE et al v. PATRIOT DRILLING FLUIDS et al
as 2:2017cv00914
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SERRETTE , TIMOTHY HEMPHILL , BARRY SERRETTE and others
Defendant:
PATRIOT DRILLING FLUIDS , Q'MAX SOLUTIONS and Q'MAX AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FISHER v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2016cv01653
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FISHER
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
FISHER et al v. ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK
as 2:2015cv05736
Plaintiff:
MARY ANN FISHER and DEBORAH WATERS
Defendant:
ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
FISHER v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2013cv05973
Plaintiff:
JOHN FISHER
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
FISHER v. CROSSMARK, INC.
as 2:2013cv00416
Plaintiff:
ROBIN FISHER
Defendant:
CROSSMARK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McELIECE et al v. THE PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2012cv00460
Plaintiff:
BRIAN McELIECE , DANIEL ROCKWELL , JASON ALEXANDER and others
Defendant:
THE PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
