Labor Cases filed in Michigan
Courtney v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv12631
Plaintiff: Deborah Courtney
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Traczyk v. Aspirus, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00077
Defendant: The Board of Directors of Aspirus, Inc., Unknown Parties, Aspirus, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Kimberly D. Traczyk
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Fund for the Electrical Industry, Detroit, Michigan et al v. Courtney Nicholson
as 2:2015cv10487
Plaintiff: Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Fund for the Electrical Industry, Detroit, Michigan and Electrical Workers' Insurance Fund
Defendant: Courtney Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Box et al v. Employee Benefit Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01144
Defendant: Employee Benefit Solutions, Inc. and Mark Sisson
Plaintiff: Courtney Lynn Box and Reeves Box
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Medina et al v. Asker et al
as 2:2013cv12539
Plaintiff: Armando Medina , Fernando Escobar , Christian Salinas and others
Defendant: Happy Asker , Happy's Pizza Franchise, LLC , Happy's Pizza Chicago #1, Inc. and others
Russell v. Happy's Pizza Franchise, LLC et al
as 5:2013cv11628
Plaintiff: Courtney Russell
Defendant: Happy's Pizza Franchise, LLC , Happy Asker , Lansing #33, Inc. and others
Russell v. Happy's Pizza Franchise, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00323
Plaintiff: Courtney Russell
Defendant: Happy's Pizza Franchise, LLC , Happy Asker , Lansing #33, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chao v. Construction Material, Incorporated
as 2:2008cv11702
Plaintiff: Elaine L. Chao
Defendant: Construction Material, Incorporated, David G Cutler, Courtney Teague and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?