Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CAUDILLO, et al v ADVANCE SERVICES INC, et al
as 1:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alberto Caudillo, Alexis Alejandro Caudillo, Cinthia Caudillo Pina and others
Defendant:
Advance Services, Inc., Corteva Agri-Science, Inc., Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
Arias et al v. AEI Painting Contractors, LLC, et al
as 1:2020cv00550
Plaintiff:
Oscar Chirinos, Darwin Navarro, Felix Chirinos and others
Defendant:
AEI Painting Contractors, LLC, and Chad Skinner
Mendoza v. ME Restaurant of Brookhaven, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv05849
Defendant:
ME Restaurant of Brookhaven, LLC and Maher Alboumeh
Plaintiff:
Pedro Mendoza
Cortes-Mendoza v. H2S Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03623
Plaintiff:
Arturo Cortes-Mendoza
Defendant:
H2S Holdings, LLC , Here To Serve Restaurants, Inc. , Big Fish Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Banegas et al v. Reliable Drywall Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02674
Plaintiff:
Leonel Banegas , Mariela Mejia , Zeluma Mendoza and others
Defendant:
Reliable Drywall Contractors, Inc., Saucedos Drywall LLC and Timothy S. Looney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Galarzo et al v. Mulkey Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01011
Plaintiff:
Anselmo Galarzo , Sidronio Galarzo , Noe Galarzo and others
Defendant:
Mulkey Enterprises, Inc. and Haro Construction Company, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Mulkey Enterprises, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Haro Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Rios et al v. Bell's Complete Landscaping, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02311
Plaintiff:
Juan Mendoza Rios and Carlos Pacheco
Defendant:
Bell's Complete Landscaping, Inc. and Michael Bell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Mendoza v. Woodman Insulation Co., Inc.
as 1:2009cv00776
Plaintiff:
Faustino Mendoza
Defendant:
Woodman Insulation Co., Inc. and Woodman Insulation Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
