Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Clickner v. Union Electric Company
as 2:2023cv04011
Plaintiff:
Fancy Clickner
Defendant:
Union Electric Company doing business as Ameren Missouri
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Ameren Illinois Company v. International Brotherhood of E
as 18-1591
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMEREN ILLINOIS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 51
Feazel v. Ameren Long Term Disability Plan for Non-union Employees et al
as 3:2017cv01221
Plaintiff:
Jacob P Feazel
Defendant:
Ameren Long Term Disability Plan for Non-union Employees and Ameren Service Company as Plan Administrator
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ameren Illinois Company v International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 51
as 3:2017cv03163
Plaintiff:
Ameren Illinois Company
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 51
Counter_claimant:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 51
Counter_defendant:
Ameren Illinois Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Macon v. Ameren Employee Medical Plan
as 4:2014cv01625
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Macon
Defendant:
Ameren Employee Medical Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chiropractic Accident & Wellness Centre of Crestwood, P.C. v. Ameren Corporation
as 4:2009cv00952
Defendant:
Ameren Corporation
Plaintiff:
Chiropractic Accident & Wellness Centre of Crestwood, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Chiropractic Accident And Wellness Centre of Crestwood, P.C. v. Ameren Corporation
as 4:2009cv00027
Plaintiff:
Chiropractic Accident And Wellness Centre of Crestwood, P.C.
Defendant:
Ameren Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Norman Banks v. AmerenUE, et al
as 07-3367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Norman Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Ameren UE and Craig Sherrill
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
