Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bolton et al v. Inland Fresh Seafood Corporation of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04602
Plaintiff:
Rani Bolton, Alison Mercker, James Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Inland Fresh Seafood Corporation of America, Inc., Joel Knox, Bill Demmond and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Fleming-Armstrong v. Superior Surgical Associates, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03935
Plaintiff:
Santasha Fleming-Armstrong
Defendant:
Superior Surgical Associates, Inc.
Armstrong v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings et al
as 1:2021cv04137
Plaintiff:
Ann Armstrong
Defendant:
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings and Laboratory Corporation of America
Armstrong v. City of Woodstock, Georgia
as 1:2021cv03646
Plaintiff:
Alex Armstrong
Defendant:
City of Woodstock, Georgia
Armstrong v. Strickland & Sons Pipeline, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00271
Plaintiff:
James Armstrong
Defendant:
Strickland & Sons Pipeline, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Ledbetter v. IDN-Armstrong's, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04157
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Ledbetter
Defendant:
IDN-Armstrong's, Inc. and IDN Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Pippen et al v. Fulton County, Georgia
as 1:2017cv00362
Plaintiff:
Damarcus Pippen and William Armstrong, Jr.
Defendant:
Fulton County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Bankston v. Sewon America, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00207
Plaintiff:
Craig Bankston
Defendant:
Sewon America, Inc. and Chris Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Armstrong v. AC Sweepers and Maintenance, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01846
Plaintiff:
Michael Armstrong
Defendant:
AC Sweepers and Maintenance, Inc. and Latasha Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Armstrong v. The Bartech Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00592
Plaintiff:
D'Edra Armstrong
Defendant:
The Bartech Group, Inc. and Verizon Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
